<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Vanguard Scotland Systems Thinking Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog</link>
	<description>Systems thinking management - helping service organisations become industry leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Create Crisis by A Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/create-crisis/comment-page-1#comment-7914</link>
		<dc:creator>A Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=635#comment-7914</guid>
		<description>Stuart - once again you have excelled! Not only was your missive bladder-strainingly funny, it was evocative and fabulously timed - I am leading a discussion tomorrow with my colleagues on how we can create a burning platform to provoke the change that is so desperately needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart &#8211; once again you have excelled! Not only was your missive bladder-strainingly funny, it was evocative and fabulously timed &#8211; I am leading a discussion tomorrow with my colleagues on how we can create a burning platform to provoke the change that is so desperately needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Create Crisis by BR Deshpande</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/create-crisis/comment-page-1#comment-7906</link>
		<dc:creator>BR Deshpande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=635#comment-7906</guid>
		<description>This is a good message. However it only works in a rational non-chaotic system. A system that is completely swamped by noise and entropy will not be affected, and this message will simply add to the din. 

If you cannot fathom what i am describing, i would suggest you to visit a place witnessing superhot economic growth but is saddled by a creaky dysfunctional bureaucracy. In short, visit India, better yet come to Bangalore!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good message. However it only works in a rational non-chaotic system. A system that is completely swamped by noise and entropy will not be affected, and this message will simply add to the din. </p>
<p>If you cannot fathom what i am describing, i would suggest you to visit a place witnessing superhot economic growth but is saddled by a creaky dysfunctional bureaucracy. In short, visit India, better yet come to Bangalore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Create Crisis by John Rudkin</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/create-crisis/comment-page-1#comment-7897</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rudkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=635#comment-7897</guid>
		<description>Crisis, what crisis? Sometimes the solution is &quot;blame it on someone else&quot;, then sit back and act like a hero.

I saw a similar thing where I once worked. For several weeks there had been warnings, until one day things just started falling over - The Conficker virus had hit.

Parts of the network and VIOP started misbehaving seriously, and the network rapidly cluttered with data overload.  The immediate reaction was &quot;How bad can this be?&quot; and &quot;Lets see if it gets worse?&quot;  It got worse.  I was one who rolled up my sleeves and dived in, trying to find infected machines and switch them off/get them off the network.  After a while I decided to leave it to the experts (after all, I&#039;m no PC user, I use a Mac - and guess why?).  In came the expensive consultants, meetings abounded, blame was pitched - but the issue was not being dealt with.

&quot;Create a Crisis&quot; had happened, a scapegoat found and lots of untested answers abounded.  But the hero piece was an unknown. 

In the end I did some quiet research (on my Mac, which was unaffected of course).  I looked - for the first time, at the issue, considered to options, looked for expertise. I eventually found the Conficker Working Group.  The first advice - use pictures (its their test) to check the variant of Conficker.  

No one thought the Mac man would find the solution......indeed, initially I had a hell of a job getting anyone to listen ...... so I took a couple of reasonable people aside and looked at the suggestions.

It actually worked - and the rest is - history

Moral = When you have a Crisis, don&#039;t waste time spinning out blame and looking in the places you have always looked.  Look at how people tackle things. The answers do not always come from the most obvious direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crisis, what crisis? Sometimes the solution is &#8220;blame it on someone else&#8221;, then sit back and act like a hero.</p>
<p>I saw a similar thing where I once worked. For several weeks there had been warnings, until one day things just started falling over &#8211; The Conficker virus had hit.</p>
<p>Parts of the network and VIOP started misbehaving seriously, and the network rapidly cluttered with data overload.  The immediate reaction was &#8220;How bad can this be?&#8221; and &#8220;Lets see if it gets worse?&#8221;  It got worse.  I was one who rolled up my sleeves and dived in, trying to find infected machines and switch them off/get them off the network.  After a while I decided to leave it to the experts (after all, I&#8217;m no PC user, I use a Mac &#8211; and guess why?).  In came the expensive consultants, meetings abounded, blame was pitched &#8211; but the issue was not being dealt with.</p>
<p>&#8220;Create a Crisis&#8221; had happened, a scapegoat found and lots of untested answers abounded.  But the hero piece was an unknown. </p>
<p>In the end I did some quiet research (on my Mac, which was unaffected of course).  I looked &#8211; for the first time, at the issue, considered to options, looked for expertise. I eventually found the Conficker Working Group.  The first advice &#8211; use pictures (its their test) to check the variant of Conficker.  </p>
<p>No one thought the Mac man would find the solution&#8230;&#8230;indeed, initially I had a hell of a job getting anyone to listen &#8230;&#8230; so I took a couple of reasonable people aside and looked at the suggestions.</p>
<p>It actually worked &#8211; and the rest is &#8211; history</p>
<p>Moral = When you have a Crisis, don&#8217;t waste time spinning out blame and looking in the places you have always looked.  Look at how people tackle things. The answers do not always come from the most obvious direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to influence difficult leaders by Emma Dent</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/how-to-influence-difficult-leaders/comment-page-1#comment-6964</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=590#comment-6964</guid>
		<description>Really useful blog - it&#039;s always better to communicate face to face but certainly not always possible... I could have done with this years ago!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really useful blog &#8211; it&#8217;s always better to communicate face to face but certainly not always possible&#8230; I could have done with this years ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ugly Truth 2: Procrastination is the Enemy of Change by Ivan Woodcock</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/the-ugly-truth-2/comment-page-1#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Woodcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=583#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart, A really good blog.
Is it also a  case that senior managers  are not prepared to let existing &quot;work&quot;  (reporting on  targets - firefighting etc.)slip to allow time for change and get improvement? A problem that we encounter is that team members are not available full time as they still have to do the day job.  Senior Management is more comfortable standing up to their ankles in perceived slurry  rather than be prepared to let it get upto their knees before it recedes to an occasional puddle. This does take courage or waders instead of wellingtons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart, A really good blog.<br />
Is it also a  case that senior managers  are not prepared to let existing &#8220;work&#8221;  (reporting on  targets &#8211; firefighting etc.)slip to allow time for change and get improvement? A problem that we encounter is that team members are not available full time as they still have to do the day job.  Senior Management is more comfortable standing up to their ankles in perceived slurry  rather than be prepared to let it get upto their knees before it recedes to an occasional puddle. This does take courage or waders instead of wellingtons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ugly Truth &#45; Change Management is Boring by Andy Lippok</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/the-ugly-truth/comment-page-1#comment-6365</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Lippok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=578#comment-6365</guid>
		<description>Stuart;
Great advice as ever! But is &#039;boring&#039; the root cause reason why it is reported that over 75% of all Change Management projects fail to deliver? I wonder whether it&#039;s also due to the fact that I reckon most CM projects focus too much on the people and not enough on the System?!
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart;<br />
Great advice as ever! But is &#8216;boring&#8217; the root cause reason why it is reported that over 75% of all Change Management projects fail to deliver? I wonder whether it&#8217;s also due to the fact that I reckon most CM projects focus too much on the people and not enough on the System?!<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to slash costs and still have your service sizzle by Colin Ashworth</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/sizzling_service/comment-page-1#comment-5275</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Ashworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=537#comment-5275</guid>
		<description>Love this one…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this one…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Because It Works by Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/because-it-works/comment-page-1#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=533#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>Simply because the client was measuring and they don&#039;t have control charts set up for this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply because the client was measuring and they don&#8217;t have control charts set up for this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Because It Works by Benjamin Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/because-it-works/comment-page-1#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=533#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>Nice example.  I&#039;m curious why you didn&#039;t use a control chart to support the claim that hits went through the roof?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice example.  I&#8217;m curious why you didn&#8217;t use a control chart to support the claim that hits went through the roof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lower Cost or Better Service? by Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/lower-cost-or-better-service/comment-page-1#comment-5109</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=529#comment-5109</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart,

Had an experience last night that I thought was relevant to your thinking.

I left Elgin on the 17.58 train to Aberdeen. Was due into Aberdeen at 19.32. We stopped a couple of times, not at stations, and I began to wonder if we were running late.

I checked with the conductor/guard who confirmed that we were running around 10 mins late.

I was due to catch the 19.46 to Glasgow and I told him this. He advised me to go to the front of the train, go straight up the stairs and it would be on Platform 3 or 4, I would need to hurry.

We arrived in at 19.43. I rushed to the stairs, along with several guys who had got on at Dyce, I suspect just coming off the rigs. As we got to the top of the stairs the 19.46 to Glasgow pulled away from the platform.

We had an hour to wait for the next train. When the conductor came along on the 20.42 train I asked why they wouldn&#039;t wait for the incoming train. She told me that they would be fined if they didn&#039;t depart on time.

So effectively, screw the travellers, we achieved our targets.

Another example of what you&#039;re preaching against, thought you might like to go and work with Scotrail?

Cheers Eileen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart,</p>
<p>Had an experience last night that I thought was relevant to your thinking.</p>
<p>I left Elgin on the 17.58 train to Aberdeen. Was due into Aberdeen at 19.32. We stopped a couple of times, not at stations, and I began to wonder if we were running late.</p>
<p>I checked with the conductor/guard who confirmed that we were running around 10 mins late.</p>
<p>I was due to catch the 19.46 to Glasgow and I told him this. He advised me to go to the front of the train, go straight up the stairs and it would be on Platform 3 or 4, I would need to hurry.</p>
<p>We arrived in at 19.43. I rushed to the stairs, along with several guys who had got on at Dyce, I suspect just coming off the rigs. As we got to the top of the stairs the 19.46 to Glasgow pulled away from the platform.</p>
<p>We had an hour to wait for the next train. When the conductor came along on the 20.42 train I asked why they wouldn&#8217;t wait for the incoming train. She told me that they would be fined if they didn&#8217;t depart on time.</p>
<p>So effectively, screw the travellers, we achieved our targets.</p>
<p>Another example of what you&#8217;re preaching against, thought you might like to go and work with Scotrail?</p>
<p>Cheers Eileen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lower Cost or Better Service? by Ron Skea</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/lower-cost-or-better-service/comment-page-1#comment-5058</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Skea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=529#comment-5058</guid>
		<description>Spot on about the lower cost v quality nonsense. You  don&#039;t need to go as far as America for an example of how you can get both. I have flown BA domestic flights a few times recently and not only was the price as low as the cheap and nasty Ryanair (once you add in all their hidden charges) but I got great service as well. No mad rush for unallocated seats at boarding and no hard sell of a range of lottery tickets, grub, car hire etc like you get on Ryanair. I don&#039;t suppose BA are systems thinkers but they still show that cost and quality are not mutually exclusive. Imagine how much better still their service and profits could be with a bit of systems thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on about the lower cost v quality nonsense. You  don&#8217;t need to go as far as America for an example of how you can get both. I have flown BA domestic flights a few times recently and not only was the price as low as the cheap and nasty Ryanair (once you add in all their hidden charges) but I got great service as well. No mad rush for unallocated seats at boarding and no hard sell of a range of lottery tickets, grub, car hire etc like you get on Ryanair. I don&#8217;t suppose BA are systems thinkers but they still show that cost and quality are not mutually exclusive. Imagine how much better still their service and profits could be with a bit of systems thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you Standardise work? by Tim vanGasteren</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/standardise-work/comment-page-1#comment-4901</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim vanGasteren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsthinkingmethod.com/blog/?p=375#comment-4901</guid>
		<description>Just a note of appreciation that I am grateful for the clarification and relevance of standardisation in the application of &#039;systems thinking&#039;. The contents of this blog should be more widely distributed to bring into context the concept of &#039;standardisation&#039;, often the topic of irrational debate on other blog sites.
Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note of appreciation that I am grateful for the clarification and relevance of standardisation in the application of &#8217;systems thinking&#8217;. The contents of this blog should be more widely distributed to bring into context the concept of &#8217;standardisation&#8217;, often the topic of irrational debate on other blog sites.<br />
Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

